here is a post i wrote for integral living pod. i thought it would be a good one to add to my blog. . . . .
integral theory isn’t necessarily something one practices, like meditation or yoga, but rather, it is how you live your life, which includes meditation or yoga (as an example among countless). you would live integrally (if that’s a real word?) meaning that you would try to incorporate aspects of everything. let me explain what i mean. it is a buddhist saying that we should be always inquisitive towards our world. it’s something like that. we should cultivate our interior realm (like meditating, physcotherapy, or various other forms of interior work), we should further our physical being (like with excersize, eating well, etc.) we should engage our exterior world (like being interested in natural wonders, how the sun looks in the morning, etc.). also, we have to relate to other people, so we should be conscious in how we act towards others, and we have to relate to our culture, so there is awareness built in there as well. last but not least, we need to understand our place in things, like our history, personal and societal, why we are where we are and where are we going. this doesn’t mean we all have to experts in everything. but we should be aware of things going on within ourselves and around ourselves, in our world.
bascially, it’s an attempt to be the best we can be, in all aspects of our reality. like if we were to plant a seed outside. we have to take into consideration what the soil mixture is like, what the climate is like for the plant, how much sun should it get, how much water, and how will it interact with the plants around it. we look all this up about the plant before we do anything so we make sure we are doing the right thing for it. it’s like that. we cultivate ourselves in the same way, with lovingkindness, so we can ensure our growth toward the sun in all aspects.
integral theory has room for all other things, because it’s basically a framework for how all of those other things fit and work toegerther. so a physics theory of everything in only an aspect of reality. it takes into account the quantum working of reality, how our material (our own matter, what we are all made of physically) functions and it would tie all of the other theories together to that physical reality could all get along. this fits into the integral theory in the “it” realm, because it deals with physical matter. that is only one part of a whole, one part of the world and on part of the person. that is why integral theory stresses “integral” because we need many parts to create the whole!
as to the question i am responding to, i have had many people say the exact same thing to me. this has been my personal response, not what i’ve read in any book or whatever, but what i feel to be true in this regard. ken wilber’s philosophy is in many ways that, philosophy. there is and has been and will always be a level of academia to philosophy simply because of the nature of the beast. many of his books are geared to strictly an academic look at his philosophy, relating it to other academic philosophies, critiques, etc. but, saying all this, in all of his writings, he lets the spritual intensity of his energy glimmer through. those passages are always the most beautiful in his books and are the most inspiring on that level. there are a lot of specifics, labeling of lines, levels, quadrants, etc. but the jist of the whole thing, the meaning within all of the terminology is quite simple in it’s complexity, beautiful in its message. it is a bit like life as we know it. we all have complexity in our lives, nature has tremendous complexity in her design, but there is always a simpicity to it, an ideal undercurrent that incorporates all and is it’s own energy.
Access: Public
Print
views (137)